proxy-compare.com
What regulators and prosecutors have actually done

Where the addresses come from

What regulators and prosecutors have actually done

Proxy Compare keeps a dated record of every seizure, fine and sourcing disclosure it holds for the 35 residential proxy sellers it tracks, each with its primary source. 21 of those sellers publish nothing about where their addresses come from, read 5 Oct 2026, and that gap is where enforcement has repeatedly landed.

How we check · report a mistake

This is the record of formal action against residential proxy providers we track, seizures, fines, and sourcing disclosures with a primary source behind them. It is generated from our vendor data rather than written, so it cannot drift from what the provider pages say.

How to read this

Each entry carries the date we recorded it and, where one exists, a link to the primary document. Where we hold no source link, the entry says so, an unsourced claim about a company is worth less than no claim, and marking it is how you can tell the difference.

This list is not a list of bad companies. A sourcing disclosure means a provider told the public where its addresses come from, which is the opposite of a mark against it.

12 Aug 2026Sourcing disclosureProxyRack

Recruits paid peers to supply residential IPs

primary source

14 Mar 2026Sourcing disclosureIPRoyal

Gets its IPs from a phone app

primary source

10 Jan 2026Sourcing disclosureDataImpulse

Gets its IPs from bundled apps

No primary source on file. Treat as unverified.

1 Sept 2025Sourcing disclosurePacketStream

Gets its IPs from paid volunteers

primary source

Questions

Does an entry here mean I should not buy from that provider?

Not by itself. A seizure means the platform no longer exists to buy from. A sourcing disclosure is a provider being open about its supply, which is a point in its favour. A fine is a fact about the past that you should read the underlying document about.